Multisignature wallets
Who holds the keys, whether the code is open, whether development is alive. The score is ours and made only of things that can be checked.
Wallets run by several signatures or by a smart contract. 5 entries
| Name | Score | Code | Last update | Code reviews | Keys |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safe | 8/10 | GPL-3.0 | August 30, 2026 | — | With the user |
| Squads | 8/10 | AGPL-3.0 | August 20, 2026 | — | With the user |
| Ambire | 6/10 | GPL-3.0 | March 16, 2026 | — | With the user |
| Sequence | 6/10 | Open | February 13, 2026 | — | With the user |
| Argent | 5/10 | Open | March 14, 2025 | — | With the user |
How this kind works
No single signature can move the money: several are needed out of an agreed number — two of three, say. One stolen or lost signature stops being the end of the story, and that is the whole point. It suits shared money and large amounts meant to sit still. The price is complexity: signatures must be coordinated, signers must be reachable, and losing several keys at once locks the money away for good. Here a mistake in the setup is more dangerous than malware.
What the score is made of
Wallet: open code 3, development in the past three months 3 (within a year 1), code review 2, keys with the user 2.
A low score means «we could check little», not «this one is a bad choice». Closed code offers nothing to look at — that is an absence of proof, not an accusation.
Open code and development from GitHub, code reviews and networks from DefiLlama. The list itself is ours.